The specification discrepancy ledger

Checked 9 October 2026. JILI’s original page names Super Ace, 1,024 ways, LOW-MED volatility and a 10,000x maximum. The BingoPlus guide describes 2,500x, Medium and 96% RTP, and mixes five-by-four prose with a five-by-five facts table.

These pages do not establish whether a different operator build explains every difference. We can document the disagreement; we cannot silently reconcile it by choosing the larger payout or more attractive percentage.

ClaimJILI original pageBingoPlus guideOur treatment
Maximum10,000x2,500xUnresolved build/source difference
GridPublished image: 5 × 45 × 4 prose; 5 × 5 tableUse the pictured original grid; flag the mixed label
VolatilityLOW-MEDMediumAttribute each description
RTPNot stated in reviewed overview96%No universal percentage asserted

Reviewed 9 October 2026: JILI original product page · BingoPlus guide. No live operator build was tested.

96% is an attributed claim, not our universal specification

The reviewed operator guide supplies 96%; the original JILI overview inspected here does not provide an RTP number. We therefore do not put a universal 96% or 97% badge on the homepage.

Theoretical RTP describes expected returned stakes over the game’s mathematical model. It is not the percentage of players who win, the chance of a winning spin or a promise that a short session returns that amount. Read the actual loaded game’s information screen.

A maximum is not a likely outcome

For illustration, 10,000 times a 10-credit stake equals 100,000 credits. That multiplication does not establish the chance of reaching the stated cap, operator stake limits or entitlement to a withdrawal.

We identify 10,000x specifically as the provider page’s published maximum. Jackpot variants, promotions and different editions need their own evidence. A maximum number is not a reason to raise a stake.

No invented sample return

This project does not publish a 1,000-round test, a hit rate or a bonus frequency. Interface captures and source comparisons answer different questions from a settled outcome dataset.

A valid later result study would preserve each paid round, its free-game continuations and the reconciled balance. Until that exists, the payout tool remains an arithmetic illustration.

Ready to check a listing?

Match the title and provider before choosing a platform. Our comparison keeps evidence dates and unknowns visible.